The connection between outcrossing distance and you can cumulative physical fitness was not extreme (quadratic regression: F

The connection between outcrossing distance and you can cumulative physical fitness was not extreme (quadratic regression: F

For two forest types from inside the Sri Lanka’s moist region forests, fruits lay increased significantly having outcrossing range, peaking in the intermediate-point inside-tree crosses (1–ten kilometres depending on kinds). Into the crosses anywhere between trees occupying independent forest supplies, but not, fresh fruit place was rather faster (or nearly very) for kinds. Alternatively, seed germination and you will seedling level at the step 1 year having Sh. cordifolia suggested crossbreed vitality around-tree crosses. The results off nearest-neighbors mating ranged one of woods and you may types; the brand new imply physical fitness price of nearest-neighbors mating relative to mating with meagerly much more faraway natives are 45% having S. rubicundum and you will 0% having Sh. cordifolia. On the other hand, the brand new physical fitness negative effects of between-forest crossing was in fact good for both varieties (52 and you may 70% according to contained in this-forest crosses for similar a couple variety). Crossing outcomes decreased within degree of fruit lay and you can 1-yr-dated seedling size; only the previous was extreme both for kinds. Efficiency indicate a powerful potential for biparental inbreeding depression within this forest forest populations and you may limited reproductive separation among woods occupying the rest tree supplies during the Sri Lanka’s damp region.

Inbreeding anxiety is usually quoted since the an inescapable consequence of anthropogenic disturbance to help you tropical forest (age.grams., tree fragmentation, logging), where principle predicts that typical mating activities in this already low-density tree populations is shifted so you’re able to like quick-distance crosses. To date, although not, the effects off increased near-next-door neighbor mating for society fitness during the tropical trees provides yet , to help you be quantified empirically. One or two important issues to be addressed try: Perform grownups prevent maturing seeds produced by near-neighbors crosses and you may, if not, exactly how fit is actually near-neighbor-derived progeny in accordance with others? This research analyzes the consequences of close-next-door neighbor mating in 2 warm tree variety really using exercise comparisons off crosses ranging from nearest neighbors having crosses associated with so much more faraway friends.

Shorea cordifolia (Dipterocarpaceae) was an in your area plentiful head canopy types that herbs heavily from the unpredictable supra-yearly intervals (We. Good. You. Letter. Gunatilleke et al., unpublished studies). Flowers of this varieties is light and you may quick-stayed, plus the winged fresh fruit was spread of the wind otherwise the law of gravity. For the extremely limited vegetables dispersal, genetic relatedness one of close natives inside the absolute tree is expected so you can become higher. Within the signed tree in the Sinharaja, Sh. cordifolia always takes place in clumps of ?5–20 people, intermixed having faster stems (individual observation).

Analysis investigation

For both species, within-treatment variation among maternal trees in fruit set was substantial for all outcrosses involving pollen donors within Sinharaja Reserve. In contrast, variation in fruit set rate was very low for between-forest crosses (Fig. 2). For Sh. cordifolia, fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment ranged from only 0.5 to 0.6% and was significantly lower than the mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 2.71%, Fstep 1,58 = 9.94, P < 0.0003). For S. rubicundum, mean fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment (2.67%) was low relative to mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 5.97%). The difference was nearly significant (Fstep one,58 = 3.78, P < 0.06).

For Sh. cordifolia, cumulative fitness was maximum at both the distant neighbor and distant within-forest treatments (Fig. 5). Peak cumulative fitness observed for these intermediate crossing treatments was 2 and 4.3 times the cumulative fitnesses of the nearest-neighbor and distant between-forest treatments, respectively, although these differences were not significant (Table 3B). dos,8 = 3.70, P = 0.073). Mean cumulative fitness of open-pollinated flowers exceeded that of all other hand-pollination treatments, again likely due to the detrimental effect of the hand-pollination procedure on fruit set in this species. As for fruit set, mean cumulative fitness (relative) of the distant between-forest treatment (mean = 0.12) was significantly lower than that of all within-forest outcrossed classes combined (mean = 0.51, Fstep one,twelve = 8.77, P = 0.012).

Near-next-door neighbor crossing perception

Near-neighbor crossing effects have been demonstrated for a number of coniferous species (Coles and Fowler, 1976; Park and Fowler, 1982, 1984; Latta et al., 1998), but only three studies have yielded evidence of near-neighbor crossing effects in woody angiosperms (Syzygium cormiflorum-Crome and Irvine, 1986; Schiedea spp.-Sakai, Karoly, and Weller, 1989; Eucalyptus globules-Hardner, Potts, and Gore, 1998). In another study suggestive of biparental inbreeding depression, mean fruit set rates were significantly lower for intraspecific crosses <0.5 km distance than for crosses >1 km distance for three subcanopy tree species (Inga spp.) in Costa Rica (Koptur, 1984). In fact, it may be that biparental inbreeding depression is common in natural populations of forest trees, but that estimation of its potential through experimental cross-pollinations has been limited to only a few species due to the obvious difficulty of working in the canopy. To my knowledge, there are no published reports of failed attempts to find near-neighbor crossing effects in natural populations of forest trees.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *